↓ Skip to main content

The Geobacillus Pan-Genome: Implications for the Evolution of the Genus

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Geobacillus Pan-Genome: Implications for the Evolution of the Genus
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2016
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00723
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oliver K. Bezuidt, Rian Pierneef, Amin M. Gomri, Fiyin Adesioye, Thulani P. Makhalanyane, Karima Kharroub, Don A. Cowan

Abstract

The genus Geobacillus is comprised of a diverse group of spore-forming Gram-positive thermophilic bacterial species and is well known for both its ecological diversity and as a source of novel thermostable enzymes. Although the mechanisms underlying the thermophilicity of the organism and the thermostability of its macromolecules are reasonably well understood, relatively little is known of the evolutionary mechanisms, which underlie the structural and functional properties of members of this genus. In this study, we have compared 29 Geobacillus genomes, with a specific focus on the elements, which comprise the conserved core and flexible genomes. Based on comparisons of conserved core and flexible genomes, we present evidence of habitat delineation with specific Geobacillus genomes linked to specific niches. Our analysis revealed that Geobacillus and Anoxybacillus share a high proportion of genes. Moreover, the results strongly suggest that horizontal gene transfer is a major factor deriving the evolution of Geobacillus from Bacillus, with genetic contributions from other phylogenetically distant taxa.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
Unknown 69 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 21%
Student > Master 14 20%
Student > Bachelor 12 17%
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 24%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 9%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 12 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2016.
All research outputs
#12,958,254
of 22,873,031 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#9,274
of 24,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,341
of 334,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#252
of 563 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,873,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 563 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.