↓ Skip to main content

Commentary: Clinical utilization of genomics data produced by the international Pseudomonas aeruginosa consortium

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Commentary: Clinical utilization of genomics data produced by the international Pseudomonas aeruginosa consortium
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2016
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00770
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erica L. Fonseca, Ana Carolina P. Vicente

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 50%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 25%
Engineering 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2016.
All research outputs
#13,471,094
of 22,873,031 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#10,570
of 24,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,210
of 333,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#279
of 573 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,873,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 573 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.