↓ Skip to main content

Myxobacteria: Moving, Killing, Feeding, and Surviving Together

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
294 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
376 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Myxobacteria: Moving, Killing, Feeding, and Surviving Together
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2016
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00781
Pubmed ID
Authors

José Muñoz-Dorado, Francisco J. Marcos-Torres, Elena García-Bravo, Aurelio Moraleda-Muñoz, Juana Pérez

Abstract

Myxococcus xanthus, like other myxobacteria, is a social bacterium that moves and feeds cooperatively in predatory groups. On surfaces, rod-shaped vegetative cells move in search of the prey in a coordinated manner, forming dynamic multicellular groups referred to as swarms. Within the swarms, cells interact with one another and use two separate locomotion systems. Adventurous motility, which drives the movement of individual cells, is associated with the secretion of slime that forms trails at the leading edge of the swarms. It has been proposed that cellular traffic along these trails contributes to M. xanthus social behavior via stigmergic regulation. However, most of the cells travel in groups by using social motility, which is cell contact-dependent and requires a large number of individuals. Exopolysaccharides and the retraction of type IV pili at alternate poles of the cells are the engines associated with social motility. When the swarms encounter prey, the population of M. xanthus lyses and takes up nutrients from nearby cells. This cooperative and highly density-dependent feeding behavior has the advantage that the pool of hydrolytic enzymes and other secondary metabolites secreted by the entire group is shared by the community to optimize the use of the degradation products. This multicellular behavior is especially observed in the absence of nutrients. In this condition, M. xanthus swarms have the ability to organize the gliding movements of 1000s of rods, synchronizing rippling waves of oscillating cells, to form macroscopic fruiting bodies, with three subpopulations of cells showing division of labor. A small fraction of cells either develop into resistant myxospores or remain as peripheral rods, while the majority of cells die, probably to provide nutrients to allow aggregation and spore differentiation. Sporulation within multicellular fruiting bodies has the benefit of enabling survival in hostile environments, and increases germination and growth rates when cells encounter favorable conditions. Herein, we review how these social bacteria cooperate and review the main cell-cell signaling systems used for communication to maintain multicellularity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 376 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 374 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 19%
Student > Master 65 17%
Student > Bachelor 53 14%
Researcher 33 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 4%
Other 33 9%
Unknown 106 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 86 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 77 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 29 8%
Environmental Science 16 4%
Chemistry 14 4%
Other 36 10%
Unknown 118 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,182,002
of 24,503,376 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#680
of 27,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,230
of 343,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#26
of 562 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,503,376 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 562 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.