↓ Skip to main content

T4 Phage Tail Adhesin Gp12 Counteracts LPS-Induced Inflammation In Vivo

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
T4 Phage Tail Adhesin Gp12 Counteracts LPS-Induced Inflammation In Vivo
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2016
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01112
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paulina Miernikiewicz, Anna Kłopot, Ryszard Soluch, Piotr Szkuta, Weronika Kęska, Katarzyna Hodyra-Stefaniak, Agnieszka Konopka, Marcin Nowak, Dorota Lecion, Zuzanna Kaźmierczak, Joanna Majewska, Marek Harhala, Andrzej Górski, Krystyna Dąbrowska

Abstract

Bacteriophages that infect Gram-negative bacteria often bind to the bacterial surface by interaction of specific proteins with lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Short tail fiber proteins (tail adhesin, gp12) mediate adsorption of T4-like bacteriophages to Escherichia coli, binding surface proteins or LPS. Produced as a recombinant protein, gp12 retains its ability to bind LPS. Since LPS is able to exert a major impact on the immune response in animals and in humans, we have tested LPS-binding phage protein gp12 as a potential modulator of the LPS-induced immune response. We have produced tail adhesin gp12 in a bacterial expression system and confirmed its ability to form trimers and to bind LPS in vitro by dynamic light scattering. This product had no negative effect on mammalian cell proliferation in vitro. Further, no harmful effects of this protein were observed in mice. Thus, gp12 was used in combination with LPS in a murine model, and it decreased the inflammatory response to LPS in vivo, as assessed by serum levels of cytokines IL-1 alpha and IL-6 and by histopathological analysis of spleen, liver, kidney and lungs. Thus, in future studies gp12 may be considered as a potential tool for modulating and specifically for counteracting LPS-related physiological effects in vivo.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nepal 1 <1%
Unknown 108 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 18%
Student > Master 18 17%
Student > Bachelor 17 16%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 32 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 41 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2016.
All research outputs
#17,811,101
of 22,880,691 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#17,254
of 24,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,189
of 355,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#336
of 486 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,911 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 486 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.