↓ Skip to main content

Insights into Bacteriophage Application in Controlling Vibrio Species

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Insights into Bacteriophage Application in Controlling Vibrio Species
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2016
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01114
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vengadesh Letchumanan, Kok-Gan Chan, Priyia Pusparajah, Surasak Saokaew, Acharaporn Duangjai, Bey-Hing Goh, Nurul-Syakima Ab Mutalib, Learn-Han Lee

Abstract

Bacterial infections from various organisms including Vibrio sp. pose a serious hazard to humans in many forms from clinical infection to affecting the yield of agriculture and aquaculture via infection of livestock. Vibrio sp. is one of the main foodborne pathogens causing human infection and is also a common cause of losses in the aquaculture industry. Prophylactic and therapeutic usage of antibiotics has become the mainstay of managing this problem, however, this in turn led to the emergence of multidrug resistant strains of bacteria in the environment; which has raised awareness of the critical need for alternative non-antibiotic based methods of preventing and treating bacterial infections. Bacteriophages - viruses that infect and result in the death of bacteria - are currently of great interest as a highly viable alternative to antibiotics. This article provides an insight into bacteriophage application in controlling Vibrio species as well underlining the advantages and drawbacks of phage therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 1%
Nepal 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 175 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 16%
Student > Bachelor 27 15%
Student > Master 20 11%
Researcher 18 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 50 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 11 6%
Environmental Science 6 3%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 51 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2022.
All research outputs
#4,797,269
of 23,317,888 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#4,899
of 25,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,303
of 364,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#141
of 488 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,317,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 488 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.