↓ Skip to main content

Serological Evidence of Immune Priming by Group A Streptococci in Patients with Acute Rheumatic Fever

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Serological Evidence of Immune Priming by Group A Streptococci in Patients with Acute Rheumatic Fever
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2016
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01119
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeremy M. Raynes, Hannah R. C. Frost, Deborah A. Williamson, Paul G. Young, Edward N. Baker, John D. Steemson, Jacelyn M. Loh, Thomas Proft, P. R. Dunbar, Polly E. Atatoa Carr, Anita Bell, Nicole J. Moreland

Abstract

Acute rheumatic fever (ARF) is an autoimmune response to Group A Streptococcus (GAS) infection. Repeated GAS exposures are proposed to 'prime' the immune system for autoimmunity. This notion of immune-priming by multiple GAS infections was first postulated in the 1960s, but direct experimental evidence to support the hypothesis has been lacking. Here, we present novel methodology, based on antibody responses to GAS T-antigens, that enables previous GAS exposures to be mapped in patient sera. T-antigens are surface expressed, type specific antigens and GAS strains fall into 18 major clades or T-types. A panel of recombinant T-antigens was generated and immunoassays were performed in parallel with serum depletion experiments allowing type-specific T-antigen antibodies to be distinguished from cross-reactive antibodies. At least two distinct GAS exposures were detected in each of the ARF sera tested. Furthermore, no two sera had the same T-antigen reactivity profile suggesting that each patient was exposed to a unique series of GAS T-types prior to developing ARF. The methods have provided much-needed experimental evidence to substantiate the immune-priming hypothesis, and will facilitate further serological profiling studies that explore the multifaceted interactions between GAS and the host.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 14 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 10%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2016.
All research outputs
#20,941,392
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#23,632
of 26,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#321,037
of 366,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#414
of 483 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,073 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 483 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.