↓ Skip to main content

Bacteriophage Procurement for Therapeutic Purposes

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
373 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bacteriophage Procurement for Therapeutic Purposes
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, August 2016
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01177
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beata Weber-Dąbrowska, Ewa Jończyk-Matysiak, Maciej Żaczek, Małgorzata Łobocka, Marzanna Łusiak-Szelachowska, Andrzej Górski

Abstract

Bacteriophages (phages), discovered 100 years ago, are able to infect and destroy only bacterial cells. In the current crisis of antibiotic efficacy, phage therapy is considered as a supplementary or even alternative therapeutic approach. Evolution of multidrug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacterial strains poses a real threat, so it is extremely important to have the possibility to isolate new phages for therapeutic purposes. Our phage laboratory and therapy center has extensive experience with phage isolation, characterization, and therapeutic application. In this article we present current progress in bacteriophages isolation and use for therapeutic purposes, our experience in this field and its practical implications for phage therapy. We attempt to summarize the state of the art: properties of phages, the methods for their isolation, criteria of phage selection for therapeutic purposes and limitations of their use. Perspectives for the use of genetically engineered phages to specifically target bacterial virulence-associated genes are also briefly presented.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 373 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Nepal 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 369 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 16%
Student > Bachelor 60 16%
Student > Master 49 13%
Researcher 29 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 5%
Other 54 14%
Unknown 103 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 70 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 61 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 56 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 2%
Other 31 8%
Unknown 126 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2022.
All research outputs
#4,077,260
of 23,063,209 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#4,026
of 25,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,681
of 356,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#121
of 434 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,063,209 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,218 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 434 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.