↓ Skip to main content

Bacillus pumilus Cyanide Dihydratase Mutants with Higher Catalytic Activity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bacillus pumilus Cyanide Dihydratase Mutants with Higher Catalytic Activity
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, August 2016
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01264
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary A. Crum, B. Trevor Sewell, Michael J. Benedik

Abstract

Cyanide degrading nitrilases are noted for their potential to detoxify industrial wastewater contaminated with cyanide. However, such application would benefit from an improvement to characteristics such as their catalytic activity and stability. Following error-prone PCR for random mutagenesis, several cyanide dihydratase mutants from Bacillus pumilus were isolated based on improved catalysis. Four point mutations, K93R, D172N, A202T, and E327K were characterized and their effects on kinetics, thermostability and pH tolerance were studied. K93R and D172N increased the enzyme's thermostability whereas E327K mutation had a less pronounced effect on stability. The D172N mutation also increased the affinity of the enzyme for its substrate at pH 7.7 but lowered its k cat. However, the A202T mutation, located in the dimerization or the A surface, destabilized the protein and abolished its activity. No significant effect on activity at alkaline pH was observed for any of the purified mutants. These mutations help confirm the model of CynD and are discussed in the context of the protein-protein interfaces leading to the protein quaternary structure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Master 5 19%
Student > Bachelor 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 7 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 19%
Environmental Science 2 7%
Engineering 2 7%
Chemistry 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2016.
All research outputs
#18,148,462
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#17,701
of 25,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,264
of 357,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#316
of 436 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,624 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 436 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.