↓ Skip to main content

More Is Better: Selecting for Broad Host Range Bacteriophages

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
265 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
592 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
More Is Better: Selecting for Broad Host Range Bacteriophages
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, September 2016
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01352
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexa Ross, Samantha Ward, Paul Hyman

Abstract

Bacteriophages are viruses that infect bacteria. In this perspective, we discuss several aspects of a characteristic feature of bacteriophages, their host range. Each phage has its own particular host range, the range of bacteria that it can infect. While some phages can only infect one or a few bacterial strains, other phages can infect many species or even bacteria from different genera. Different methods for determining host range may give different results, reflecting the multiple mechanisms bacteria have to resist phage infection and reflecting the different steps of infection each method depends on. This makes defining host range difficult. Another difficulty in describing host range arises from the inconsistent use of the words "narrow" and especially "broad" when describing the breadth of the host range. Nearly all bacteriophages have been isolated using a single host strain of bacteria. While this procedure is fairly standard, it may more likely produce narrow rather than broad host range phage. Our results and those of others suggest that using multiple host strains during isolation can more reliably produce broader host range phages. This challenges the common belief that most bacteriophages have a narrow host range. We highlight the implications of this for several areas that are affected by host range including horizontal gene transfer and phage therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 592 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 589 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 101 17%
Student > Bachelor 96 16%
Student > Master 81 14%
Researcher 53 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 35 6%
Other 62 10%
Unknown 164 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 140 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 114 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 76 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 4%
Engineering 17 3%
Other 46 8%
Unknown 177 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,356,470
of 24,611,662 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#804
of 27,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,761
of 339,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#17
of 438 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,611,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 438 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.