↓ Skip to main content

Correlations of Host Genetics and Gut Microbiome Composition

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correlations of Host Genetics and Gut Microbiome Composition
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, August 2016
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01357
Pubmed ID
Authors

Krystyna Dąbrowska, Wojciech Witkiewicz

Abstract

The human gut microbiome has a considerable impact on host health. The long list of microbiome-related health disorders raises the question of what in fact determines microbiome composition. In this review we sought to understand how the host itself impacts the structure of the gut microbiota population, specifically by correlations of host genetics and gut microbiome composition. Host genetic profile has been linked to differences in microbiome composition, thus suggesting that host genetics can shape the gut microbiome of the host. However, cause-consequence mechanisms behind these links are still unclear. A survey of the possible mechanisms allowing host genetics to shape microbiota composition in the gut demonstrated the major role of metabolic functions and the immune system. A considerable impact of other factors, such as diet, may outweigh the effects of host genetic background. More studies are necessary for good understanding of the relations between the host genetic profile, gut microbiome composition, and host health. According to the idea of personalized medicine, patient-tailored management of microbiota content remains a fascinating area for further inquiry.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 233 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 22%
Researcher 44 19%
Student > Master 37 16%
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Student > Postgraduate 10 4%
Other 24 10%
Unknown 45 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 74 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 43 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 25 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 3%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 48 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2017.
All research outputs
#2,451,554
of 24,885,505 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#1,895
of 28,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,467
of 344,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#49
of 426 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,885,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,434 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 426 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.