↓ Skip to main content

Current State of Knowledge in Microbial Degradation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs): A Review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1078 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Current State of Knowledge in Microbial Degradation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs): A Review
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, August 2016
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01369
Pubmed ID
Authors

Debajyoti Ghosal, Shreya Ghosh, Tapan K. Dutta, Youngho Ahn

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,078 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 1073 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 199 18%
Student > Master 171 16%
Student > Bachelor 123 11%
Researcher 116 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 57 5%
Other 120 11%
Unknown 292 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 180 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 158 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 152 14%
Engineering 61 6%
Chemistry 52 5%
Other 128 12%
Unknown 347 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2016.
All research outputs
#17,345,186
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#16,037
of 29,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,810
of 354,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#249
of 427 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,761 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 427 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.