↓ Skip to main content

Nanotechnology: A Valuable Strategy to Improve Bacteriocin Formulations

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nanotechnology: A Valuable Strategy to Improve Bacteriocin Formulations
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, September 2016
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01385
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hazem A. Fahim, Ahmed S. Khairalla, Ahmed O. El-Gendy

Abstract

Bacteriocins are proteinaceous antibacterial compounds, produced by diverse bacteria, which have been successfully used as: (i) food biopreservative; (ii) anti-biofilm agents; and (iii) additives or alternatives to the currently existing antibiotics, to minimize the risk of emergence of resistant strains. However, there are several limitations that challenge the use of bacteriocins as biopreservatives/antibacterial agents. One of the most promising avenues to overcome these limitations is the use of nanoformulations. This review highlights the practical difficulties with using bacteriocins to control pathogenic microorganisms, and provides an overview on the role of nanotechnology in improving the antimicrobial activity and the physicochemical properties of these peptides.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Unknown 152 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Researcher 11 7%
Other 11 7%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 40 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 50 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2019.
All research outputs
#4,470,231
of 22,889,074 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#4,435
of 24,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,908
of 294,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#112
of 453 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,889,074 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,936 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 453 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.