You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Application of Omics Technologies for Evaluation of Antibacterial Mechanisms of Action of Plant-Derived Products
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01466 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bruno S. dos Santos, Luís C. N. da Silva, Túlio D. da Silva, João F. S. Rodrigues, Marcos A. G. Grisotto, Maria T. dos Santos Correia, Thiago H. Napoleão, Márcia V. da Silva, Patrícia M. G. Paiva |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Nepal | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 109 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 31 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 20% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 29 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2020.
All research outputs
#21,075,298
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#22,064
of 29,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,905
of 334,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#315
of 439 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 439 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.