↓ Skip to main content

Quantification of Viral and Prokaryotic Production Rates in Benthic Ecosystems: A Methods Comparison

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantification of Viral and Prokaryotic Production Rates in Benthic Ecosystems: A Methods Comparison
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, September 2016
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01501
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eugenio Rastelli, Antonio Dell’Anno, Cinzia Corinaldesi, Mathias Middelboe, Rachel T. Noble, Roberto Danovaro

Abstract

Viruses profoundly influence benthic marine ecosystems by infecting and subsequently killing their prokaryotic hosts, thereby impacting the cycling of carbon and nutrients. Previously conducted studies, based on different methodologies, have provided widely differing estimates of the relevance of viruses on benthic prokaryotes. There has been no attempt so far to compare these independent approaches, including contextual comparisons among different approaches for sample manipulation (i.e., dilution or not of the sediments during incubations), between methods based on epifluorescence microscopy (EFM) or radiotracers, and between the use of different radiotracers. Therefore, it has been difficult to identify the most suitable methodologies and protocols to be used as standard approaches for the quantification of viral infections of prokaryotes. Here, we compared for the first time different methods for determining viral and prokaryotic production rates in marine sediments collected at two benthic sites, differing in depth and environmental conditions. We used a highly replicated experimental design, testing the potential biases associated to the incubation of sediments as diluted or undiluted. In parallel, we also compared EFM counts with the (3)H-thymidine incubations for the determination of viral production rates, and the use of (3)H-thymidine versus (3)H-leucine radiotracers for the determination of prokaryotic production. We show here that, independent from sediment dilution, EFM-based values of viral production ranged from 1.4 to 4.6 × 10(7) viruses g(-1) h(-1), and were similar but overall less variable compared to those obtained by the (3)H-thymidine method (0.3 to 9.0 × 10(7) viruses g(-1)h(-1)). In addition, the prokaryotic production rates were not affected by sediment dilution, and the use of different radiotracers provided very consistent estimates (10.3-35.1 and 9.3-34.6 ngC g(-1)h(-1) using the (3)H-thymidine or (3)H-leucine method, respectively). These results indicated that viral lysis was responsible for the abatement of 55-81% of the prokaryotic heterotrophic production, corroborating previous findings of the major role of viruses in benthic deep-sea ecosystems. Moreover, our methodological comparison for the analysis of viral production in marine sediments suggests that microscopy-based approaches are simpler and more cost-effective than those based on radiotracers. These approaches also reduce time to results and overcome issues related to generation of radioactive waste.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 49 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Researcher 4 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 12 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 26%
Environmental Science 8 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 17 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2016.
All research outputs
#3,620,557
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#3,300
of 24,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,979
of 321,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#86
of 431 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,938 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 431 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.