↓ Skip to main content

Resource Partitioning between Bacteria, Fungi, and Protists in the Detritusphere of an Agricultural Soil

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
149 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Resource Partitioning between Bacteria, Fungi, and Protists in the Detritusphere of an Agricultural Soil
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, September 2016
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01524
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susanne Kramer, Dörte Dibbern, Julia Moll, Maike Huenninghaus, Robert Koller, Dirk Krueger, Sven Marhan, Tim Urich, Tesfaye Wubet, Michael Bonkowski, François Buscot, Tillmann Lueders, Ellen Kandeler

Abstract

The flow of plant-derived carbon in soil is a key component of global carbon cycling. Conceptual models of trophic carbon fluxes in soil have assumed separate bacterial and fungal energy channels in the detritusphere, controlled by both substrate complexity and recalcitrance. However, detailed understanding of the key populations involved and niche-partitioning between them is limited. Here, a microcosm experiment was performed to trace the flow of detritusphere C from substrate analogs (glucose, cellulose) and plant biomass amendments (maize leaves, roots) in an agricultural soil. Carbon flow was traced by rRNA stable isotope probing and amplicon sequencing across three microbial kingdoms. Distinct lineages within the Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Gammaproteobacteria, Basidiomycota, Ascomycota as well as Peronosporomycetes were identified as important primary substrate consumers. A dynamic succession of primary consumers was observed especially in the cellulose treatments, but also in plant amendments over time. While intra-kingdom niche partitioning was clearly observed, distinct bacterial and fungal energy channels were not apparent. Furthermore, while the diversity of primary substrate consumers did not notably increase with substrate complexity, consumer succession and secondary trophic links to bacterivorous and fungivorous microbes resulted in increased food web complexity in the more recalcitrant substrates. This suggests that rather than substrate-defined energy channels, consumer succession as well as intra- and inter-kingdom cross-feeding should be considered as mechanisms supporting food web complexity in the detritusphere.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 202 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 21%
Researcher 32 16%
Student > Master 29 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 8%
Student > Bachelor 12 6%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 47 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 80 39%
Environmental Science 21 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 1%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 70 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2016.
All research outputs
#3,168,653
of 24,885,505 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#2,768
of 28,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,606
of 329,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#66
of 440 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,885,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,434 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 440 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.