You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Corrigendum: Bacteriophage Procurement for Therapeutic Purposes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01813 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Beata Weber-Dąbrowska, Ewa Jończyk-Matysiak, Maciej Żaczek, Małgorzata B. Łobocka, Marzanna Łusiak-Szelachowska, Andrzej Górski |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,645,091
of 23,277,141 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#8,383
of 25,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,236
of 314,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#187
of 436 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,277,141 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,564 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 436 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.