↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Tween 80 on Growth and Biofilm Formation in Laboratory Media

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
375 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of Tween 80 on Growth and Biofilm Formation in Laboratory Media
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, November 2016
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01878
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina K. Nielsen, Jørgen Kjems, Tina Mygind, Torben Snabe, Rikke L. Meyer

Abstract

Tween 80 is a widely used non-ionic emulsifier that is added to cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, and foods. Because of its widespread use we need to understand how it affects bacteria on our skin, in our gut, and in food products. The aim of this study is to investigate how Tween 80 affects the growth and antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, and Pseudomonas fluorescens, which are common causes of spoilage and foodborne illnesses. Addition of 0.1% Tween 80 to laboratory growth media increased the growth rate of planktonic S. aureus batch cultures, and it also increased the total biomass when S. aureus was grown as biofilms. In contrast, Tween 80 had no effect on batch cultures of L. monocytogenes, it slowed the growth rate of P. fluorescens, and it led to formation of less biofilm by both L. monocytogenes and P. fluorescens. Furthermore, Tween 80 lowered the antibacterial efficacy of two hydrophobic antimicrobials: rifampicin and the essential oil isoeugenol. Our findings underline the importance of documenting indirect effects of emulsifiers when studying the efficacy of hydrophobic antimicrobials that are dispersed in solution by emulsification, or when antimicrobials are applied in food matrixes that include emulsifiers. Furthermore, the species-specific effects on microbial growth suggests that Tween 80 in cosmetics and food products could affect the composition of skin and gut microbiota, and the effect of emulsifiers on the human microbiome should therefore be explored to uncover potential health effects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 375 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Kazakhstan 1 <1%
Unknown 374 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 14%
Student > Bachelor 51 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 11%
Researcher 27 7%
Student > Postgraduate 12 3%
Other 47 13%
Unknown 142 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 26 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 21 6%
Chemistry 16 4%
Other 58 15%
Unknown 153 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,686,369
of 23,358,705 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#2,241
of 25,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,953
of 418,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#61
of 421 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,358,705 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 421 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.