You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Disease Model of Muscle Necrosis Caused by Aeromonas dhakensis Infection in Caenorhabditis elegans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2016.02058 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Po-Lin Chen, Yi-Wei Chen, Chun-Chun Ou, Tzer-Min Lee, Chi-Jung Wu, Wen-Chien Ko, Chang-Shi Chen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 7 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 24% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,616,848
of 23,221,875 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#8,347
of 25,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,176
of 422,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#197
of 391 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,221,875 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 391 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.