↓ Skip to main content

Molecules to Ecosystems: Actinomycete Natural Products In situ

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Molecules to Ecosystems: Actinomycete Natural Products In situ
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2017
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2016.02149
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott W. Behie, Bailey Bonet, Vineetha M. Zacharia, Dylan J. McClung, Matthew F. Traxler

Abstract

Actinomycetes, filamentous actinobacteria found in numerous ecosystems around the globe, produce a wide range of clinically useful natural products (NP). In natural environments, actinomycetes live in dynamic communities where environmental cues and ecological interactions likely influence NP biosynthesis. Our current understating of these cues, and the ecological roles of NP, is in its infancy. We postulate that understanding the ecological context in which actinomycete metabolites are made is fundamental to advancing the discovery of novel NP. In this review we explore the ecological relevance of actinomycetes and their secondary metabolites from varying ecosystems, and suggest that investigating the ecology of actinomycete interactions warrants particular attention with respect to metabolite discovery. Furthermore, we focus on the chemical ecology and in situ analysis of actinomycete NP and consider the implications for NP biosynthesis at ecosystem scales.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 198 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 22%
Student > Master 27 14%
Student > Bachelor 26 13%
Researcher 24 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 41 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 19%
Chemistry 22 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 48 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2017.
All research outputs
#5,863,359
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#5,501
of 26,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,590
of 421,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#154
of 391 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,068 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 391 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.