You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Commentary: Microbial Small Talk: Volatiles in Fungal–Bacterial Interactions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stéphane Hacquard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 5 | 33% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 27% |
| Germany | 2 | 13% |
| Finland | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 53% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 13 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 44% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 15 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2017.
All research outputs
#3,140,527
of 22,931,367 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#2,913
of 24,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,815
of 419,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#85
of 423 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,931,367 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,972 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 423 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.