↓ Skip to main content

xMAP Technology: Applications in Detection of Pathogens

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
xMAP Technology: Applications in Detection of Pathogens
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2017
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00055
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nikol Reslova, Veronika Michna, Martin Kasny, Pavel Mikel, Petr Kralik

Abstract

xMAP technology is applicable for high-throughput, multiplex and simultaneous detection of different analytes within a single complex sample. xMAP multiplex assays are currently available in various nucleic acid and immunoassay formats, enabling simultaneous detection and typing of pathogenic viruses, bacteria, parasites and fungi and also antigen or antibody interception. As an open architecture platform, the xMAP technology is beneficial to end users and therefore it is used in various pharmaceutical, clinical and research laboratories. The main aim of this review is to summarize the latest findings and applications in the field of pathogen detection using microsphere-based multiplex assays.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 179 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 14%
Researcher 21 12%
Student > Master 20 11%
Other 12 7%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 49 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 7%
Engineering 8 4%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 51 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2017.
All research outputs
#13,546,001
of 22,961,203 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#10,589
of 25,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,318
of 419,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#238
of 407 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,961,203 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 407 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.