↓ Skip to main content

Intestinal Microbiota and Weight-Gain in Preterm Neonates

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intestinal Microbiota and Weight-Gain in Preterm Neonates
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2017
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00183
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silvia Arboleya, Pablo Martinez-Camblor, Gonzalo Solís, Marta Suárez, Nuria Fernández, Clara G. de los Reyes-Gavilán, Miguel Gueimonde

Abstract

The involvement of the gut microbiota on weight-gain and its relationship with childhood undernutrition and growth has been reported. Thus, the gut microbiota constitutes a potential therapeutic target for preventing growth impairment. However, our knowledge in this area is limited. In this study we aimed at evaluating the relationship among early microbiota, growth, and development in preterm infants. To this end we assessed the levels of specific microorganisms by qPCR, and those of short chain fatty acids by mean of gas-chromatography, in feces from 63 preterm newborns and determined their weight-gain during the first months. The statistical analyses performed indicate an influence of the intestinal microbiota in weight-gain, with the levels of some microorganisms showing a significant association with the weight-gain of the infant. The levels of specific microbial groups during the first days of life were found to affect weight gain by the age of 1 month. Moreover, clustering of the infants on the basis of the microbiota composition at 1 month of age rendered groups which showed differences in weight z-scores. Our results suggest an association between the gut microbiota composition and weight-gain in preterm infants at early life and point out potential microbial targets for favoring growth and maturation in these infants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 103 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 17%
Other 11 10%
Researcher 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 32 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 33 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2017.
All research outputs
#6,286,617
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#6,174
of 24,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,513
of 420,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#186
of 412 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,990 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 412 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.