↓ Skip to main content

Acetylation of Lysine 243 Inhibits the oriC Binding Ability of DnaA in Escherichia coli

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acetylation of Lysine 243 Inhibits the oriC Binding Ability of DnaA in Escherichia coli
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2017
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00699
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shuxian Li, Qiufen Zhang, Zhihong Xu, Yu-Feng Yao

Abstract

DNA replication initiation is a central event in the cell cycle, and it is strictly controlled by multiple regulatory mechanisms. Our previous work showed that acetylation of residue lysine (K) 178 prevents DnaA from binding to ATP, which leads to the inhibition of DNA replication initiation. Here, we show that another residue, K243, is critical for DnaA full activity in vivo. K243 can be acetylated, and its acetylation level varies with cell growth. A homogeneous, recombinant DnaA that contains N(𝜀)-acetyllysine at K243 (K243Ac) retained its ATP/ADP binding ability, but showed decreased binding activity to the oriC region. A DNase I footprinting assay showed that DnaA K243Ac failed to recognize DnaA boxes I3, C1, and C3, and, thus, it formed an incomplete initiation complex with oriC. Finally, we found that acetyl phosphate and the deacetylase CobB can regulate the acetylation level of K243 in vivo. These findings suggest that DnaA K243 acetylation disturbs its binding to low-affinity DnaA boxes, and they provide new insights into the regulatory mechanisms of DNA replication initiation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Master 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 52%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 26%
Chemistry 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Unknown 4 15%