↓ Skip to main content

Microbial Degradation of Lobster Shells to Extract Chitin Derivatives for Plant Disease Management

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microbial Degradation of Lobster Shells to Extract Chitin Derivatives for Plant Disease Management
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2017
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00781
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gayathri Ilangumaran, Glenn Stratton, Sridhar Ravichandran, Pushp S. Shukla, Philippe Potin, Samuel Asiedu, Balakrishnan Prithiviraj

Abstract

Biodegradation of lobster shells by chitinolytic microorganisms are an environment safe approach to utilize lobster processing wastes for chitin derivation. In this study, we report degradation activities of two microbes, "S223" and "S224" isolated from soil samples that had the highest rate of deproteinization, demineralization and chitinolysis among ten microorganisms screened. Isolates S223 and S224 had 27.3 and 103.8 protease units mg(-1) protein and 12.3 and 11.2 μg ml(-1) of calcium in their samples, respectively, after 1 week of incubation with raw lobster shells. Further, S223 contained 23.8 μg ml(-1) of N-Acetylglucosamine on day 3, while S224 had 27.3 μg ml(-1) on day 7 of incubation with chitin. Morphological observations and 16S rDNA sequencing suggested both the isolates were Streptomyces. The culture conditions were optimized for efficient degradation of lobster shells and chitinase (∼30 kDa) was purified from crude extract by affinity chromatography. The digested lobster shell extracts induced disease resistance in Arabidopsis by induction of defense related genes (PR1 > 500-fold, PDF1.2 > 40-fold) upon Pseudomonas syringae and Botrytis cinerea infection. The study suggests that soil microbes aid in sustainable bioconversion of lobster shells and extraction of chitin derivatives that could be applied in plant protection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 18%
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 22 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 13%
Engineering 5 6%
Chemistry 4 5%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 26 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2019.
All research outputs
#2,843,804
of 22,973,051 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#2,523
of 25,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,903
of 310,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#81
of 523 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,973,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,034 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 523 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.