↓ Skip to main content

The Importance of H in Particulate Organic Matter Stoichiometry, Export and Energy Flow

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Importance of H in Particulate Organic Matter Stoichiometry, Export and Energy Flow
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2017
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00826
Pubmed ID
Authors

David M. Karl, Eric Grabowski

Abstract

The discipline of marine ecological stoichiometry has progressed rapidly over the past two decades, and continues to be at the forefront of microbial oceanography. Most of this effort has been focused on the elements carbon (C) and nitrogen (N), and to a lesser extent phosphorus (P), with little consideration of hydrogen (H), or the redox state of the organic matter pools despite the fact that H is the most abundant, and possibly the most important, element in biogeochemistry. Obtaining accurate estimates of the H content of organic matter, either in suspended or sinking particles, is a major analytical challenge. While many aquatic science laboratories have access to commercial "C-H-N elemental analyzers," few investigators report H values due to analytical difficulties in obtaining accurate estimates of H. Because organic compounds vary considerably in their H:C ratio and therefore in their energy content, measurements of H combined with C-specific caloric estimates will ultimately be required for a more comprehensive understanding of ecosystem dynamics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 28%
Student > Master 7 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 9 28%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 13%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 9 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2017.
All research outputs
#13,314,170
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#9,916
of 25,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,114
of 310,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#270
of 520 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 520 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.