↓ Skip to main content

Survey of Antibiotic-producing Bacteria Associated with the Epidermal Mucus Layers of Rays and Skates

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Survey of Antibiotic-producing Bacteria Associated with the Epidermal Mucus Layers of Rays and Skates
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2017
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01050
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kim B. Ritchie, Melbert Schwarz, Joseph Mueller, Valeri A. Lapacek, Daniel Merselis, Catherine J. Walsh, Carl A. Luer

Abstract

Elasmobranchs represent a distinct group of cartilaginous fishes that harbor a remarkable ability to heal wounds rapidly and without infection. To date very little work has addressed this phenomenon although it is suggested that antibiotic capabilities associated with epidermal surfaces may be a factor. The study of benefits derived from mutualistic interactions between unicellular and multicellular organisms is a rapidly growing area of research. Here we survey and identify bacterial associates of three ray and one skate species in order to assess the potential for antibiotic production from elasmobranch associated bacteria as a novel source for new antibiotics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 27%
Researcher 12 25%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 7 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 21%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 8 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2017.
All research outputs
#2,730,349
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#2,354
of 25,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,363
of 313,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#95
of 526 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,070 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 526 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.