↓ Skip to main content

Identification, Bioactivity, and Productivity of Actinomycins from the Marine-Derived Streptomyces heliomycini

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification, Bioactivity, and Productivity of Actinomycins from the Marine-Derived Streptomyces heliomycini
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, June 2017
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01147
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dongyang Wang, Cong Wang, Pengyan Gui, Haishan Liu, Sameh M. H. Khalaf, Elsayed A. Elsayed, Mohammed A. M. Wadaan, Wael N. Hozzein, Weiming Zhu

Abstract

In the process of profiling the secondary metabolites of actinobacteria isolated from the Saudi coastal habitats for production of antibiotics and anti-cancer drugs, the cultures of strain WH1 that was identified as Streptomyces heliomycini exhibited strong antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus. By means of MS and NMR techniques, the active compounds were characterized as actinomycins X0β, X2, and D, respectively. The research on the productivity of this strain for actinomycins revealed that the highest production of actinomycins X0β, X2, and D was reached in the medium MII within 5% salinity and pH 8.5. In this optimized condition, the fermentation titers of actinomycins X0β, X2, and D were 107.6 ± 4.2, 283.4 ± 75.3, and 458.0 ± 76.3 mg/L, respectively. All the three actinomycins X0β, X2, and D showed potent cytotoxicities against the MCF-7, K562, and A549 tumor cell lines, in which actinomycin X2 was the most active against the three tumor cell lines with the IC50 values of 0.8-1.8 nM. Both actinomycins X2 and D showed potent antibacterial activities against S. aureus and the methicillin-resistant S. aureus, Bacillus subtilis, and B. cereus and the actinomycin X2 was more potent.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 21%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Researcher 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 20 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 23 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2017.
All research outputs
#18,560,904
of 22,988,380 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#19,486
of 25,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,460
of 315,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#416
of 531 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,988,380 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 531 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.