↓ Skip to main content

Fast and Simple Analysis of MiSeq Amplicon Sequencing Data with MetaAmp

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fast and Simple Analysis of MiSeq Amplicon Sequencing Data with MetaAmp
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, August 2017
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01461
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaoli Dong, Manuel Kleiner, Christine E. Sharp, Erin Thorson, Carmen Li, Dan Liu, Marc Strous

Abstract

Microbial community profiling by barcoded 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing currently has many applications in microbial ecology. The low costs of the parallel sequencing of multiplexed samples, combined with the relative ease of data processing and interpretation (compared to shotgun metagenomes) have made this an entry-level approach. Here we present the MetaAmp pipeline for processing of SSU rRNA gene and other non-coding or protein-coding amplicon sequencing data by investigators that are inexperienced with bioinformatics procedures. It accepts single-end or paired-end sequences in fasta or fastq format from various sequencing platforms. It includes read quality control, and merging of forward and reverse reads of paired-end reads. It makes use of UPARSE, Mothur, and the SILVA database for clustering, removal of chimeric reads, taxonomic classification, and generation of diversity metrics. The pipeline has been validated with a mock community of known composition. MetaAmp provides a convenient web interface as well as command line interface. It is freely available at: http://ebg.ucalgary.ca/metaamp. Since its launch 2 years ago, MetaAmp has been used >2,800 times, by many users worldwide.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 184 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 18%
Researcher 30 16%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 28 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 21%
Environmental Science 15 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 8%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 39 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2017.
All research outputs
#3,915,611
of 23,821,324 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#3,722
of 26,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,808
of 318,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#140
of 520 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,821,324 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,483 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,803 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 520 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.