↓ Skip to main content

Analysing Microbial Community Composition through Amplicon Sequencing: From Sampling to Hypothesis Testing

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
25 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
990 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysing Microbial Community Composition through Amplicon Sequencing: From Sampling to Hypothesis Testing
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, September 2017
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01561
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luisa W. Hugerth, Anders F. Andersson

Abstract

Microbial ecology as a scientific field is fundamentally driven by technological advance. The past decade's revolution in DNA sequencing cost and throughput has made it possible for most research groups to map microbial community composition in environments of interest. However, the computational and statistical methodology required to analyse this kind of data is often not part of the biologist training. In this review, we give a historical perspective on the use of sequencing data in microbial ecology and restate the current need for this method; but also highlight the major caveats with standard practices for handling these data, from sample collection and library preparation to statistical analysis. Further, we outline the main new analytical tools that have been developed in the past few years to bypass these caveats, as well as highlight the major requirements of common statistical practices and the extent to which they are applicable to microbial data. Besides delving into the meaning of select alpha- and beta-diversity measures, we give special consideration to techniques for finding the main drivers of community dissimilarity and for interaction network construction. While every project design has specific needs, this review should serve as a starting point for considering what options are available.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 990 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 990 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 209 21%
Student > Master 176 18%
Researcher 140 14%
Student > Bachelor 102 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 49 5%
Other 122 12%
Unknown 192 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 305 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 161 16%
Environmental Science 115 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 48 5%
Engineering 22 2%
Other 97 10%
Unknown 242 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,375,826
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#815
of 29,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,827
of 324,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#21
of 517 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,739 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 517 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.