↓ Skip to main content

Comparative Genomics of Sibling Species of Fonsecaea Associated with Human Chromoblastomycosis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative Genomics of Sibling Species of Fonsecaea Associated with Human Chromoblastomycosis
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, October 2017
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01924
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vania A. Vicente, Vinícius A. Weiss, Amanda Bombassaro, Leandro F. Moreno, Flávia F. Costa, Roberto T. Raittz, Aniele C. Leão, Renata R. Gomes, Anamelia L. Bocca, Gheniffer Fornari, Raffael J. A. de Castro, Jiufeng Sun, Helisson Faoro, Michelle Z. Tadra-Sfeir, Valter Baura, Eduardo Balsanelli, Sandro R. Almeida, Suelen S. Dos Santos, Marcus de Melo Teixeira, Maria S. Soares Felipe, Mariana Machado Fidelis do Nascimento, Fabio O. Pedrosa, Maria B. Steffens, Derlene Attili-Angelis, Mohammad J. Najafzadeh, Flávio Queiroz-Telles, Emanuel M. Souza, Sybren De Hoog

Abstract

Fonsecaea and Cladophialophora are genera of black yeast-like fungi harboring agents of a mutilating implantation disease in humans, along with strictly environmental species. The current hypothesis suggests that those species reside in somewhat adverse microhabitats, and pathogenic siblings share virulence factors enabling survival in mammal tissue after coincidental inoculation driven by pathogenic adaptation. A comparative genomic analysis of environmental and pathogenic siblings of Fonsecaea and Cladophialophora was undertaken, including de novo assembly of F. erecta from plant material. The genome size of Fonsecaea species varied between 33.39 and 35.23 Mb, and the core genomes of those species comprises almost 70% of the genes. Expansions of protein domains such as glyoxalases and peptidases suggested ability for pathogenicity in clinical agents, while the use of nitrogen and degradation of phenolic compounds was enriched in environmental species. The similarity of carbohydrate-active vs. protein-degrading enzymes associated with the occurrence of virulence factors suggested a general tolerance to extreme conditions, which might explain the opportunistic tendency of Fonsecaea sibling species. Virulence was tested in the Galleria mellonella model and immunological assays were performed in order to support this hypothesis. Larvae infected by environmental F. erecta had a lower survival. Fungal macrophage murine co-culture showed that F. erecta induced high levels of TNF-α contributing to macrophage activation that could increase the ability to control intracellular fungal growth although hyphal death were not observed, suggesting a higher level of extremotolerance of environmental species.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 13 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 19 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2017.
All research outputs
#14,956,881
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#13,962
of 25,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,743
of 324,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#329
of 524 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,097 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 524 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.