↓ Skip to main content

Single Cell Protein—State-of-the-Art, Industrial Landscape and Patents 2001–2016

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 X users
patent
6 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
1183 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Single Cell Protein—State-of-the-Art, Industrial Landscape and Patents 2001–2016
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, October 2017
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anneli Ritala, Suvi T. Häkkinen, Mervi Toivari, Marilyn G. Wiebe

Abstract

By 2050, the world would need to produce 1,250 million tonnes of meat and dairy per year to meet global demand for animal-derived protein at current consumption levels. However, growing demand for protein will not be met sustainably by increasing meat and dairy production because of the low efficiency of converting feed to meat and dairy products. New solutions are needed. Single cell protein (SCP), i.e., protein produced in microbial and algal cells, is an option with potential. Much of the recent interest in SCP has focused on the valorisation of side streams by using microorganisms to improve their protein content, which can then be used in animal feed. There is also increased use of mixed populations, rather than pure strains in the production of SCP. In addition, the use of methane as a carbon source for SCP is reaching commercial scales and more protein-rich products are being derived from algae for both food and feed. The following review addresses the latest developments in SCP production from various organisms, giving an overview of commercial exploitation, a review of recent advances in the patent landscape (2001-2016) and a list of industrial players in the SCP field.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1183 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 151 13%
Student > Bachelor 143 12%
Student > Master 140 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 138 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 44 4%
Other 125 11%
Unknown 442 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 194 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 184 16%
Engineering 65 5%
Environmental Science 62 5%
Chemical Engineering 60 5%
Other 121 10%
Unknown 497 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,066,892
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#599
of 29,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,817
of 338,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#16
of 517 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 517 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.