↓ Skip to main content

Metabolic Engineering of Oleaginous Yeasts for Production of Fuels and Chemicals

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
patent
5 patents

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Metabolic Engineering of Oleaginous Yeasts for Production of Fuels and Chemicals
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, November 2017
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02185
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shuobo Shi, Huimin Zhao

Abstract

Oleaginous yeasts have been increasingly explored for production of chemicals and fuels via metabolic engineering. Particularly, there is a growing interest in using oleaginous yeasts for the synthesis of lipid-related products due to their high lipogenesis capability, robustness, and ability to utilize a variety of substrates. Most of the metabolic engineering studies in oleaginous yeasts focused on Yarrowia that already has plenty of genetic engineering tools. However, recent advances in systems biology and synthetic biology have provided new strategies and tools to engineer those oleaginous yeasts that have naturally high lipid accumulation but lack genetic tools, such as Rhodosporidium, Trichosporon, and Lipomyces. This review highlights recent accomplishments in metabolic engineering of oleaginous yeasts and recent advances in the development of genetic engineering tools in oleaginous yeasts within the last 3 years.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 191 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 17%
Student > Master 27 14%
Researcher 22 12%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Other 9 5%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 56 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 20%
Chemical Engineering 14 7%
Engineering 10 5%
Chemistry 6 3%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 64 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2023.
All research outputs
#4,184,500
of 25,079,481 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#3,934
of 28,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,110
of 338,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#140
of 582 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,079,481 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 582 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.