↓ Skip to main content

Host and Pathway Engineering for Enhanced Lycopene Biosynthesis in Yarrowia lipolytica

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Host and Pathway Engineering for Enhanced Lycopene Biosynthesis in Yarrowia lipolytica
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, November 2017
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02233
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cory Schwartz, Keith Frogue, Joshua Misa, Ian Wheeldon

Abstract

Carotenoids are a class of molecules with commercial value as food and feed additives with nutraceutical properties. Shifting carotenoid synthesis from petrochemical-based precursors to bioproduction from sugars and other biorenewable carbon sources promises to improve process sustainability and economics. In this work, we engineered the oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica to produce the carotenoid lycopene. To enhance lycopene production, we tested a series of strategies to modify host cell physiology and metabolism, the most successful of which were mevalonate pathway overexpression and alleviating auxotrophies previously engineered into the PO1f strain of Y. lipolytica. The beneficial engineering strategies were combined into a single strain, which was then cultured in a 1-L bioreactor to produce 21.1 mg/g DCW. The optimized strain overexpressed a total of eight genes including two copies of HMG1, two copies of CrtI, and single copies of MVD1, EGR8, CrtB, and CrtE. Recovering leucine and uracil biosynthetic capacity also produced significant enhancement in lycopene titer. The successful engineering strategies characterized in this work represent a significant increase in understanding carotenoid biosynthesis in Y. lipolytica, not only increasing lycopene titer but also informing future studies on carotenoid biosynthesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 109 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 16%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 37 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 22%
Chemical Engineering 5 5%
Engineering 4 4%
Chemistry 3 3%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 43 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2017.
All research outputs
#17,923,510
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#17,409
of 25,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#305,417
of 437,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#395
of 531 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 531 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.