You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Molecular Survey of Viral and Bacterial Causes of Childhood Diarrhea in Khartoum State, Sudan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00112 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mosab A. Adam, Ji Wang, Khalid-A. Enan, Hongwei Shen, Hao Wang, Abdel R. El Hussein, Azza B. Musa, Isam M. Khidir, Xuejun Ma |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 16% |
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 27 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 14% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 29 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2022.
All research outputs
#4,169,535
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#4,272
of 24,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,905
of 443,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#151
of 558 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,694 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 558 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.