↓ Skip to main content

Recent Developments of the Synthetic Biology Toolkit for Clostridium

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recent Developments of the Synthetic Biology Toolkit for Clostridium
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00154
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rochelle C. Joseph, Nancy M. Kim, Nicholas R. Sandoval

Abstract

TheClostridiumgenus is a large, diverse group consisting of Gram-positive, spore-forming, obligate anaerobic firmicutes. Among this group are historically notorious pathogens as well as several industrially relevant species with the ability to produce chemical commodities, particularly biofuels, from renewable biomass. Additionally, other species are studied for their potential use as therapeutics. Although metabolic engineering and synthetic biology have been instrumental in improving product tolerance, titer, yields, and feed stock consumption capabilities in several organisms, low transformation efficiencies and lack of synthetic biology tools and genetic parts make metabolic engineering within theClostridiumgenus difficult. Progress has recently been made to overcome challenges associated with engineering variousClostridiumspp. For example, developments in CRISPR tools in multiple species and strains allow greater capability to produce edits with greater precision, faster, and with higher efficiencies. In this mini-review, we will highlight these recent advances and compare them to established methods for genetic engineering inClostridium. In addition, we discuss the current state and development ofClostridium-based promoters (constitutive and inducible) and reporters. Future progress in this area will enable more rapid development of strain engineering, which would allow for the industrial exploitation ofClostridiumfor several applications including bioproduction of several commodity products.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 208 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 19%
Researcher 40 19%
Student > Master 28 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 4%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 49 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 65 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 7%
Chemical Engineering 9 4%
Engineering 8 4%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 60 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2022.
All research outputs
#5,219,599
of 25,186,033 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#5,140
of 28,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,728
of 457,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#163
of 553 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,186,033 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,884 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 553 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.