↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of Bona Fide sRNAs in Staphylococcus aureus

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of Bona Fide sRNAs in Staphylococcus aureus
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00228
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wenfeng Liu, Tatiana Rochat, Claire Toffano-Nioche, Thao Nguyen Le Lam, Philippe Bouloc, Claire Morvan

Abstract

Bacterial regulatory RNAs have been extensively studied for over a decade, and are progressively being integrated into the complex genetic regulatory network. Transcriptomic arrays, recent deep-sequencing data and bioinformatics suggest that bacterial genomes produce hundreds of regulatory RNAs. However, while some have been authenticated, the existence of the others varies according to strains and growth conditions, and their detection fluctuates with the methodologies used for data acquisition and interpretation. For example, several small RNA (sRNA) candidates are now known to be parts of UTR transcripts. Accurate annotation of regulatory RNAs is a complex task essential for molecular and functional studies. We definedbona fidesRNAs as those that (i) likely act intransand (ii) are not expressed from the opposite strand of a coding gene. Using published data and our own RNA-seq data, we reviewed hundreds ofStaphylococcus aureusputative regulatory RNAs using the DETR'PROK computational pipeline and visual inspection of expression data, addressing the question of which transcriptional signals correspond to sRNAs. We conclude that the model strain HG003, a NCTC8325 derivative commonly used forS. aureusgenetic regulation studies, has only about 50bona fidesRNAs, indicating that these RNAs are less numerous than commonly stated. Among them, about half are associated to theS. aureussp. core genome and a quarter are possibly expressed in otherStaphylococci. We hypothesize on their features and regulation using bioinformatic approaches.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 24%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 10 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 36%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Chemistry 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 14 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2020.
All research outputs
#7,547,578
of 23,026,672 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#8,260
of 25,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,527
of 331,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#261
of 588 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,026,672 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 588 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.