↓ Skip to main content

Indigenous Pseudomonas spp. Strains from the Olive (Olea europaea L.) Rhizosphere as Effective Biocontrol Agents against Verticillium dahliae: From the Host Roots to the Bacterial Genomes

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Indigenous Pseudomonas spp. Strains from the Olive (Olea europaea L.) Rhizosphere as Effective Biocontrol Agents against Verticillium dahliae: From the Host Roots to the Bacterial Genomes
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00277
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carmen Gómez-Lama Cabanás, Garikoitz Legarda, David Ruano-Rosa, Paloma Pizarro-Tobías, Antonio Valverde-Corredor, José L. Niqui, Juan C. Triviño, Amalia Roca, Jesús Mercado-Blanco

Abstract

The use of biological control agents (BCA), alone or in combination with other management measures, has gained attention over the past decades, driven by the need to seek for sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives to confront plant pathogens. The rhizosphere of olive (Olea europaeaL.) plants is a source of bacteria with potential as biocontrol tools against Verticillium wilt of olive (VWO) caused byVerticillium dahliaeKleb. A collection of bacterial isolates from healthy nursery-produced olive (cultivar Picual, susceptible to VWO) plants was generated based on morphological, biochemical and metabolic characteristics, chemical sensitivities, and on theirin vitroantagonistic activity against several olive pathogens. Three strains (PIC25, PIC105, and PICF141) showing highin vitroinhibition ability of pathogens' growth, particularly againstV. dahliae, were eventually selected. Their effectiveness against VWO caused by the defoliating pathotype ofV. dahliaewas also demonstrated, strain PICF141 being the rhizobacteria showing the best performance as BCA. Genotypic and phenotypic traits traditionally associated with plant growth promotion and/or biocontrol abilities were evaluated as well (e.g., phytase, xylanase, catalase, cellulase, chitinase, glucanase activities, and siderophore and HCN production). Multi-locus sequence analyses of conserved genes enabled the identification of these strains asPseudomonasspp. Strain PICF141 was affiliated to the "Pseudomonas mandeliisubgroup," within the "Pseudomonas fluorescensgroup,"Pseudomonas linibeing the closest species. Strains PIC25 and PIC105 were affiliated to the "Pseudomonas aeruginosagroup,"Pseudomonas indicabeing the closest relative. Moreover, we identifiedP. indica(PIC105) for the first time as a BCA. Genome sequencing andin silicoanalyses allowed the identification of traits commonly associated with plant-bacteria interactions. Finally, the root colonization ability of these olive rhizobacteria was assessed, providing valuable information for the future development of formulations based on these strains. A set of actions, from rhizosphere isolation to genome analysis, is proposed and discussed for selecting indigenous rhizobacteria as effective BCAs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 120 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 20%
Researcher 18 15%
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Lecturer 4 3%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 40 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Environmental Science 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 44 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,675,063
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#2,247
of 25,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,255
of 330,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#76
of 595 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 595 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.