↓ Skip to main content

Bidirectional Regulation of AdpAch in Controlling the Expression of scnRI and scnRII in the Natamycin Biosynthesis of Streptomyces chattanoogensis L10

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bidirectional Regulation of AdpAch in Controlling the Expression of scnRI and scnRII in the Natamycin Biosynthesis of Streptomyces chattanoogensis L10
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, March 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00316
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pin Yu, Qing-Ting Bu, Yi-Li Tang, Xu-Ming Mao, Yong-Quan Li

Abstract

AdpA, an AraC/XylS family protein, had been proved as a key regulator for secondary metabolism and morphological differentiation inStreptomyces griseus. Here, we identify AdpAch, an ortholog of AdpA, as a "higher level" pleiotropic regulator of natamycin biosynthesis with bidirectional regulatory ability inStreptomyces chattanoogensisL10. DNase I footprinting revealed six AdpAch-binding sites in thescnRI-scnRIIintergenic region. Further analysis using thexylEreporter gene fused to thescnRI-scnRIIintergenic region of mutated binding sites demonstrated that the expression ofscnRIandscnRIIwas under the control of AdpAch. AdpAchshowed a bi-stable regulatory ability where it firstly binds to the Site C and Site D to activate the transcription of the two pathway-specific genes,scnRIandscnRII, and then binds to other sites where it acts as an inhibitor. When Site A and Site F were mutatedin vivo, the production of natamycin was increased by 21% and 25%, respectively. These findings indicated an autoregulatory mechanism where AdpAchserves as a master switch with bidirectional regulation for natamycin biosynthesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 18%
Lecturer 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Professor 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2018.
All research outputs
#15,824,664
of 23,508,125 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#15,810
of 25,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,491
of 332,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#399
of 585 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,508,125 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 585 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.