↓ Skip to main content

Environmental Stability and Infectivity of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) in Different Human Body Fluids

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Environmental Stability and Infectivity of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) in Different Human Body Fluids
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, March 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00504
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie Pfaender, Fabian A. Helfritz, Anindya Siddharta, Daniel Todt, Patrick Behrendt, Julia Heyden, Nina Riebesehl, Wiebke Willmann, Joerg Steinmann, Jan Münch, Sandra Ciesek, Eike Steinmann

Abstract

Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a hepatotropic, blood-borne virus, but in up to one-third of infections of the transmission route remained unidentified. Viral genome copies of HCV have been identified in several body fluids, however, non-parental transmission upon exposure to contaminated body fluids seems to be rare. Several body fluids, e.g., tears and saliva, are renowned for their antimicrobial and antiviral properties, nevertheless, HCV stability has never been systematically analyzed in those fluids. Methods: We used state of the art infectious HCV cell culture techniques to investigate the stability of HCV in different body fluids to estimate the potential risk of transmission via patient body fluid material. In addition, we mimicked a potential contamination of HCV in tear fluid and analyzed which impact commercially available contact lens solutions might have in such a scenario. Results: We could demonstrate that HCV remains infectious over several days in body fluids like tears, saliva, semen, and cerebrospinal fluid. Only hydrogen-peroxide contact lens solutions were able to efficiently inactivate HCV in a suspension test. Conclusion: These results indicate that HCV, once it is present in various body fluids of infected patients, remains infective and could potentially contribute to transmission upon direct contact.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Lecturer 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 16 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Linguistics 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 16 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2023.
All research outputs
#14,094,128
of 24,677,985 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#10,114
of 28,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,192
of 334,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#285
of 594 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,677,985 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,092 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 594 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.