↓ Skip to main content

Extractable Bacterial Surface Proteins in Probiotic–Host Interaction

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Extractable Bacterial Surface Proteins in Probiotic–Host Interaction
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00645
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fillipe L. R. do Carmo, Houem Rabah, Rodrigo D. De Oliveira Carvalho, Floriane Gaucher, Barbara F. Cordeiro, Sara H. da Silva, Yves Le Loir, Vasco Azevedo, Gwénaël Jan

Abstract

Some Gram-positive bacteria, including probiotic ones, are covered with an external proteinaceous layer called a surface-layer. Described as a paracrystalline layer and formed by the self-assembly of a surface-layer-protein (Slp), this optional structure is peculiar. The surface layer per se is conserved and encountered in many prokaryotes. However, the sequence of the corresponding Slp protein is highly variable among bacterial species, or even among strains of the same species. Other proteins, including surface layer associated proteins (SLAPs), and other non-covalently surface-bound proteins may also be extracted with this surface structure. They can be involved a various functions. In probiotic Gram-positives, they were shown by different authors and experimental approaches to play a role in key interactions with the host. Depending on the species, and sometime on the strain, they can be involved in stress tolerance, in survival within the host digestive tract, in adhesion to host cells or mucus, or in the modulation of intestinal inflammation. Future trends include the valorization of their properties in the formation of nanoparticles, coating and encapsulation, and in the development of new vaccines.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 24 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 10%
Chemistry 5 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 27 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2018.
All research outputs
#15,501,670
of 23,036,991 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#15,380
of 25,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,906
of 329,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#388
of 602 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,036,991 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 602 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.