↓ Skip to main content

Absence of the Min System Does Not Cause Major Cell Division Defects in Agrobacterium tumefaciens

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Absence of the Min System Does Not Cause Major Cell Division Defects in Agrobacterium tumefaciens
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00681
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sue A. Flores, Matthew Howell, Jeremy J. Daniel, Rebecca Piccolo, Pamela J. B. Brown

Abstract

In A. tumefaciens, the essential FtsZ protein is located at the growth pole before shifting to the mid-cell right before division. Loss of FtsZ causes a halt in cell separation and lysis of cells. To understand how FtsZ polymerization is regulated to properly localize the FtsZ ring at the mid-cell, we have conducted a systematic characterization of the Min system in A. tumefaciens. Our findings indicate that the Min system is not required for cell survival. Yet, we find that the deletion of either minE or minCDE results in a broad cell size distribution, including an increase in the proportion of short and long cells. We observe that the site of constriction is misplaced in the minE or minCDE deletion strains allowing for short cells to arise from sites of constriction near the cell poles. Remarkably, the short cells are viable and contain DNA. In order to observe chromosome replication and segregation in these strains, YFP-ParB is used as a proxy to track the origin of replication as cells elongate and divide. In the absence of the Min proteins, duplication and segregation of the origin of replication is frequently delayed. Taken together, our data suggest that the Min system contributes to the proper regulation of FtsZ placement and subsequent cell division. Furthermore, the failure to precisely place FtsZ rings at mid-cell in the min mutants impacts other cell cycle features including chromosome segregation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 6 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 10%
Computer Science 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2018.
All research outputs
#3,665,297
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#3,383
of 25,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,098
of 329,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#120
of 588 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 588 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.