↓ Skip to main content

PA0833 Is an OmpA C-Like Protein That Confers Protection Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PA0833 Is an OmpA C-Like Protein That Confers Protection Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01062
Pubmed ID
Authors

Feng Yang, Jiang Gu, Jintao Zou, Langhuan Lei, Haiming Jing, Jin Zhang, Hao Zeng, Quanming Zou, Fenglin Lv, Jinyong Zhang

Abstract

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a formidable pathogen that causes infections with high mortality rates. Because of its ability to form biofilms and rapidly acquire resistance to many first-line antibiotics, P. aeruginosa-related infections are typically difficult to cure by traditional antibiotic treatment regimes. Thus, new strategies to prevent and treat such infections are urgently required. PA0833 is a newly identified protective antigen of P. aeruginosa that was identified in a screen using a reverse vaccine strategy in our laboratory. In this study, we further confirmed its protective efficacy in murine sepsis and pneumonia models. Immunization with PA0833 induced strong immune responses and resulted in reduced bacterial loads; decreased pathology, inflammatory cytokine expression and inflammatory cell infiltration; and improved survival. Furthermore, PA0833 was identified as an OmpA C-like protein by bioinformatics analysis and biochemical characterization and shown to contribute to bacterial environmental stress resistance and virulence. These results demonstrate that PA0833 is an OmpA C-like protein that induces a protective immune response in mice, indicating that PA0833 is a promising antigen for vaccine development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Other 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 11 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 7 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 14 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2018.
All research outputs
#20,520,426
of 23,088,369 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#22,836
of 25,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#289,907
of 330,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#553
of 640 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,088,369 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 640 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.