↓ Skip to main content

Phomopsis longanae Chi-Induced Disease Development and Pericarp Browning of Harvested Longan Fruit in Association With Energy Metabolism

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phomopsis longanae Chi-Induced Disease Development and Pericarp Browning of Harvested Longan Fruit in Association With Energy Metabolism
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01454
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yihui Chen, Hetong Lin, Shen Zhang, Junzheng Sun, Yifen Lin, Hui Wang, Mengshi Lin, John Shi

Abstract

Longan fruit is a popular subtropical fruit with a relatively short shelf life at room temperature mainly due to pericarp browning and fungal infection. This study aimed to investigate the infection of Phomopsis longanae Chi in longan fruit and its effects on the storability and shelf life of longan fruit. The relationship between the energy metabolism of harvested longan fruit and disease development and pericarp browning was elucidated. Results show that P. longanae-inoculation accelerated the deterioration of longan fruit and caused pericarp browning. It also led to the energy deficit in pericarp of longan fruit, which was reflected as lower contents of ATP and ADP, higher AMP content, and lower energy charge as compared to the control samples. Additionally, P. longanae-infection reduced the activities of H+-ATPase, Ca2+-ATPase, and Mg2+-ATPase in plasma, vacuolar, and mitochondrial membranes during the storage period. The results demonstrate that P. longanae-infection led to disease development and pericarp browning in harvested longan fruit, which were due to the infection-induced energy deficit and low ATPase activity that caused disorders of ion transport and distribution, and damaged the structure and function of vacuole, mitochondria, and eventually the whole cells of fruit tissues.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Master 2 15%
Professor 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 23%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Unknown 7 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2018.
All research outputs
#20,525,274
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#22,849
of 25,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#287,390
of 327,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#612
of 721 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 721 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.