You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Corrigendum: Differential Characteristics of Viral siRNAs Between Leaves and Roots of Wheat Plants Naturally Infected with Wheat Yellow Mosaic Virus, a Soil-Borne Virus
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2018
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01477 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Linying Li, Ida Bagus Andika, Yu Xu, Yan Zhang, Xiangqi Xin, Lifeng Hu, Zongtao Sun, Gaojie Hong, Yang Chen, Fei Yan, Jian Yang, Junmin Li, Jianping Chen |
Abstract |
[This corrects the article on p. 1802 in vol. 8, PMID: 28979249.]. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2018.
All research outputs
#15,540,879
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#15,430
of 25,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,329
of 327,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#440
of 721 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,270 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 721 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.