You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Spatial Patterns and Drivers of Microbial Taxa in a Karst Broadleaf Forest
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01691 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Min Song, Wanxia Peng, Fuping Zeng, Hu Du, Qin Peng, Qingguo Xu, Li Chen, Fang Zhang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 30% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 17% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 7 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 7% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2018.
All research outputs
#5,831,917
of 23,099,576 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#5,547
of 25,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,621
of 330,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#240
of 741 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,099,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 741 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.