You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Unexpected Essentiality of glnA2 in Mycobacterium smegmatis Is Salvaged by Overexpression of the Global Nitrogen Regulator glnR, but Not by L-, D- or Iso-Glutamine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02143 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nadya Rakovitsky, Michal Bar Oz, Karin Goldberg, Simon Gibbons, Oren Zimhony, Daniel Barkan |
| Abstract |
Nitrogen metabolism plays a central role in the physiology of microorganisms, and Glutamine Synthetase (GS) genes are present in virtually all bacteria. In M. tuberculosis, four GS genes are present, but only glnA1 is essential, whereas glnA2 was shown to be non-essential for in-vitro as well as in-vivo growth and pathogenesis, and is postulated to be involved in D-glutamine and iso-glutamine synthesis. Whilst investigating the activity of an antimicrobial compound in M. smegmatis, we found a spontaneous temperature-sensitive mutant in glnA2 (I133F), and used it to investigate the role of glnA2 in M. smegmatis. We deleted the native glnA2 and replaced it with a mutated allele. This re-created the temperature sensitivity-as after 3-4 seemingly normal division cycles, glnA2 became essential for growth. This essentiality could not be salvaged by neither L, D- nor iso-glutamine, suggesting an additional role of glnA2 in M. smegmatis over its role in M. tuberculosis. We also found that overexpression of the global nitrogen regulator glnR enabled bypassing the essentiality of glnA2, allowing the creation of a complete deletion mutant. The discrepancy between the importance of glnA2 in Mtb and M. smegmatis stresses the caution in which results in one are extrapolated to the other. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 9 | 82% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 9 | 82% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2018.
All research outputs
#15,018,906
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#14,043
of 25,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,699
of 337,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#419
of 697 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,285 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 697 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.