You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative Genomics of Wolbachia–Cardinium Dual Endosymbiosis in a Plant-Parasitic Nematode
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02482 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amanda M. V. Brown, Sulochana K. Wasala, Dana K. Howe, Amy B. Peetz, Inga A. Zasada, Dee R. Denver |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 43% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 28% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 18 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,133,779
of 25,332,933 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#3,741
of 29,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,836
of 355,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#124
of 685 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,332,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 685 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.