You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Screening for Fusarium Antagonistic Bacteria From Contrasting Niches Designated the Endophyte Bacillus halotolerans as Plant Warden Against Fusarium
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03236 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Houda Ben Slama, Hafsa Cherif-Silini, Ali Chenari Bouket, Mallique Qader, Allaoua Silini, Bilal Yahiaoui, Faizah N. Alenezi, Lenka Luptakova, Mohamed Ali Triki, Armelle Vallat, Tomasz Oszako, Mostafa E. Rateb, Lassaad Belbahri |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 194 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 15% |
| Researcher | 24 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 11% |
| Unknown | 72 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 59 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 9% |
| Unknown | 81 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2021.
All research outputs
#6,904,327
of 23,125,690 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#7,010
of 25,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,100
of 437,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#242
of 633 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,125,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 633 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.