You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Promises and Pitfalls of Machine Learning for Detecting Viruses in Aquatic Metagenomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00806 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alise J. Ponsero, Bonnie L. Hurwitz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 43% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 17 | 74% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 26% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 26 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 30 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2020.
All research outputs
#3,024,179
of 25,813,008 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#2,407
of 29,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,825
of 349,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#84
of 645 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,813,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,832 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 645 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.