↓ Skip to main content

Comparative Analysis of the Two Acinetobacter baumannii Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) Schemes

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative Analysis of the Two Acinetobacter baumannii Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) Schemes
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2019
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00930
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefano Gaiarsa, Gherard Batisti Biffignandi, Eliana Pia Esposito, Michele Castelli, Keith A. Jolley, Sylvain Brisse, Davide Sassera, Raffaele Zarrilli

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 123 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Master 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 41 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 24 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 7%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 46 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2022.
All research outputs
#4,334,196
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#3,994
of 29,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,773
of 364,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#114
of 615 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 615 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.